Water for Health - Taking Charge
|
Rain Harvesting in the MaldivesThe Maldives adopted a national control programme using chlorination in wells and oral rehydration salts for the treatment of diarrhoea, as well as use of rainwater for drinking. 20 years later all the islands in the country are self-sufficient with their own community rainwater collection system tanks. Deaths due to diarrhoea are now a thing of the past. |
SODIS is a nearly cost-free system because sunlight is free of charge. Nobody has to pay for it.
Sodis was pioneered in Lebanon in the 1980s. It is a simple water-treatment method which uses the sun, throw-away plastic soft-drink bottles and a black surface. Further research was carried out and promoted by the Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology on Sodis. (See also www.sodis.ch.)
Transparent bottles are filled with water and placed horizontally on a flat surface in sunlight for about five hours. The illness causing micro-organisms (pathogens) in the polluted water succumb to the killing effect of the ultraviolet light in the solar radiation. The process is enhanced when the solar water disinfection is combined with a solar thermal water treatment which makes use of the fact that the colour black absorbs light. This is accomplished by painting the bottom half of the bottle black or placing it on black-painted corrugated iron or plastic sheets.
Field studies have been conducted in Bolivia, Burkina Faso, China, Colombia, Indonesia, Lebanon, Morocco, Thailand and Togo. Testing shows the process works. Anecdotal evidence has been gathered indicating that people have less diarrhoea.
Supporters say SODIS even has advantages for conventional supply schemes where people collect water from public sources. Under this system, secondary pollution by consumers may occur which can be eliminated by the solar water-disinfection method which takes place in a closed bottle.
Our research shows that washing hands with soap would probably save half of the deaths from diarrhoeal diseases, suggests Valerie Curtis, Lecturer in Hygiene Promotion at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All it requires is soap and motivation.
But that's more easily said than done. Curtis participated in a major three-year study in India, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and West Africa to learn what motivates good hygiene practices. The results are interesting and in many ways unexpected.
The research finds that hygiene is a common value around the world. Nobody likes dirt. But, people's hygienic practices have less to do with health than with social and aesthetic considerations. Mothers want to keep their babies clean because they believe it is a loving, caring thing to do and will make their babies socially acceptable. One Indian mother explains If my child is dirty, no one will hold him in their arms, no one will love him. And, so I keep my child clean.
There has to be a rethinking of the traditional scolding, moralistic approach to hygiene, which hasn't worked. A number of studies show that people are turned off by dire warnings that they will face disease and death if they don't change, their filthy ways. For example, people in Brazil refused to collaborate in a cholera prevention program because they felt they were being accused of being filthy dogs.
Evidence is growing that positive messages are more successful than negative ones in producing behaviour change. A three-year study in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso) used positive messages to change old entrenched habits. At the end of that period, the people in the study had tripled their use of soap. Curtis says an evaluation of the intervention shows that the money spent on the programme and buying extra soap was less than what families and health agencies had been spending on treating childhood disease. There was actually a net saving on the overall programme.
Studies show that cases of diarrhoea were cut an average of 35% by the simple act of washing hands with soap and water. Getting people to change their habits represents a big task for health promoters.
Water which collects in and around houses can pose a serious risk of dengue outbreaks, the virus transmitted by Aedes mosquitos. These mosquitos, which breed in small, man-made water places such as tires and cans, can be eliminated through environmental management and organized community clean-ups. In certain settings, regulations and possibly fines can be used to rid the environment of these breeding-sites, although this may not apply to the poorest communities.
Farming communities can be encouraged to adopt new cropping practices which take water management into account. This will help reduce the spread of vector-borne disease. Through education and information, local governments can help communities better understand that their water-management practices have a direct impact on their health. Once this link is made, farmers are more likely to change their methods for the better.
Huge sums of money are invested in water-supply systems around the world. Yet many of these systems - especially in rural areas - fail because local communities are not involved in their planning, construction and management.
There is ample evidence to suggest that communities can manage their water supplies effectively if they are given the technological and financial support they need. Financing institutions are often unwilling to make the long-term commitments necessary to sustain community water systems. And if national and local governments, as well as domestic NGOs are unable to take up the slack, the systems fall into disuse.
Telling poor people what to do, telling them what's good for them, does not work. People caught in the vicious cycle of poverty and ill-health know best what's good for them and what motivates them to do what they do. Water projects would have a better chance of succeeding with minimum risk to health if nearby communities were brought into the decision-making process from the start. If local people are well informed about a water project, they will be able to weigh the benefits of development against the cost of increased risk from certain diseases.
Women are more likely than men to be motivated to do whatever is necessary to obtain and keep a more convenient and reliable water supply functioning. A project in Kwale (Kenya) shows that community management of water supplies works, especially when women are involved. Other studies from South Asia also have shown that it is essential to involve women in the design and selection of sanitation facilities. Involving women in sanitation programmes has resulted in higher coverage, better maintenance of the facilities, increased hygiene awareness, and lower incidence of faecal-oral disease in the community.
The World Health Organization and its partner agencies are well on their way to eradicating guinea worm disease, a horribly disfiguring, disabling disease caused by a large nematode (roundworm) which breeds in open water sources such as ponds and shallow wells. People who drink this contaminated water become infected. As the disease develops, they become progressively weakened and incapacitated. This has a profound effect on their ability to work, to farm and to go to school. It takes about a year for the 1 metre long worm to mature and start to release eggs, a painful and deforming process.
Hand-washing
Source: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (unpublished) |
In the middle of the 20th century, about 50 million people in Africa and Asia were infected with guinea-worm disease. By 1999, that number had been reduced to an estimated 96 000. Guinea-worm disease has been eliminated in Asia and is now prevalent in only 13 African countries. Through measures including the provision of safe drinking-water in rural and isolated areas in these countries, the campaign to eradicate this terrible disease is moving ever closer to its goal.
Protocol on Water and HealthNot every country in the WHO European region has met UN targets for safe water. Over 120 million inhabitants lack safe drinking-water. Water-related diseases, such as cholera, typhoid fever and hepatitis A are reappearing. In response, 36 countries signed a unique Protocol on Water and Health committing themselves to achieve:
|